Blue Eyes Directory · blueeyesdirectory.com
Record nan-95, printed 30 August 2026. Every animal on this sheet has its own page and its own source at that address.

Seven Teen Alice Queen

British Shorthair · the source records no eye colour · No variant and no line attributed · also in its ancestry: DBE-ALT

How this cat is connected to the trait

NO RECORDED PARENT LINK JOINS THIS CAT TO A FOUNDER OR TO A TESTED ANIMAL. Nothing in the record connects it to the trait at all.

Bar on top is the grade: Genotyped Wild type Line-traced Reported ♂ male ♀ female blue not blue no eye colour recorded a photograph is held ⚑ a numbered flag marks a record the sources disagree on

Save this cat as a PDF the connection, the genealogy and the source on one A4 landscape sheet, carrying this directory's name and address

What the pedigree implies

POSSIBLE CARRIER BY DESCENT. the Nanotigr line, no variant identified, through Baierbach Baerchen's Lillyfee, printed as Bärchen's, Dennise Great Mistery, Diego of Phoenix; the Roddifer line, no variant identified, through Hellboy of Richland Hill, La Fee von den Bunten Trollen, Shanti Shanaya v. Schonen Tal

This is computed from the recorded parentage each time this site is built and is not typed into the register. It is a deduction from the trait being dominant, not a statement by any source, and it is not the same thing as the record's own status field. Only a laboratory settles it for an individual. The full list is on latent lines.

What is flagged on this tree

SEVEN TEEN ALICE QUEEN. Duplicate. THE SAME ANIMAL IS HELD MORE THAN ONCE IN THIS REGISTER. The fuller record is nan-13, which carries the line attribution, the claimed variant and the parentage, and every parent link that pointed here has been moved to it. THIS MATTERS BEYOND TIDINESS: a duplicate splits one pedigree into two islands and depresses every coefficient and every carrier count computed through it. This record is kept so the source it came from can still be audited. IT WAS NOT CAUGHT BY THE DUPLICATE SWEEP because the sweep's normaliser could not see through this register writing BRI where PawPeds writes BSH together with a possessive apostrophe

A flag is not an error. It marks a place where two sources say different things, or where an attribution cannot be made on the evidence held.

The record

Register id: nan-95
Sex: female
Breed, as stated: British Shorthair
Eye status: unknown: the source records no eye colour
Role: ancestor
EMS code: BSH n
The code read out: British Shorthair; black
Evidence grade: Reported asserted, with neither a test nor a traced descent

In the register

Parents: Versace Man Grandroshell, Shanti Shanaya v. Schonen Tal

Blue Eyes Directory, blueeyesdirectory.com. Record nan-95. This sheet is a snapshot of a register that grows: check the address above for the current version, and for the sources behind every animal named on it.

Source

the PawPeds four-generation pedigree for CH Wabisabi's My Mona-Lee, BSH q, female, image supplied 25 August 2026. THIRTY ANCESTORS OF THIRTY POSSIBLE, twenty-seven of them unique, FOUR COMPLETE GENERATIONS OUT OF FOUR, coefficient of inbreeding 0.0 per cent. THE SHEET NAMES HEAVEN RENESMEE AS THE SIRE, which is the animal this register held second in the parents field and had recorded as female

This directory is a working aid compiled from published charts, registry documents and breeder statements. It is not a register and it has no standing of any kind. The grade attaches to the animal, not to the line: a cat whose ancestor was genotyped is line-traced, not genotyped.